Commentary
Armed robodogs appeared alongside
Serbian
soldiers in training, just weeks after the announcement of a Sino–Serbian partnership to produce 3,000 humanoid and quadruped robots annually in Serbia.
They have also made appearances in training alongside Chinese and
Cambodian
soldiers. Chinese soldiers used them during beach landings that could be training for an invasion of Taiwan.
On Sept. 14, a new
robofish
capable of underwater surveillance was unveiled by a
military
-linked company in Beijing. The company offers shark- and medium-sized robofish options. Both could potentially deliver explosives to the underside of ships.
In August, a Chinese defense contractor revealed what appear to be humanoid robots equipped with riot control gear. The same month, Chinese humanoid robots
beat
two world records held by humans—the
100-meter dash
and the high-jump.
Ukrainian and Russian soldiers are currently using tracked and wheeled robots extensively on their battlefields, drawing international attention to the role of robotics in future warfare. Ukraine is studying how humanoid and canine robots can provide military utility in areas where tracked and wheeled robots cannot go.
Chinese military strategists have envisioned the extensive use of robots for an invasion of Taiwan, including wheeled, tracked, humanoid, and canine varieties. If their transports can bypass Taiwan’s defenses, they could be loaded with explosives and used to clear ditches and bunkers before human troops deploy.
The U.S. Army believes that bipedal and quadrupedal robots are especially well-suited to urban environments designed for such locomotion and have likely roles there in security, reconnaissance, chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive (CBRNE) clearance, and combat operations.
International companies and universities aid China’s robotics explosion, which directly serves its military and threatens democracies globally.
China’s
private companies (though nothing is fully private in China) and defense contractors have
reverse-engineered
and otherwise built upon U.S. military-
funded
and academic robotics breakthroughs, which were naively and openly published.
The evidence points to Huawei’s theft of robotics technology from T-Mobile as far back as
2012
. Other robotics tech is freely shared or sold to Chinese companies, which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can then order to be shared more generally among China’s robotics researchers and manufacturers.
Now, Chinese companies are set to deploy military robotics against the United States and its allies and to outcompete U.S. robotics technology in terms of cost and scale.
The Robot Operating System (ROS) was first developed by the
Stanford
University Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, for example, but since it is open source, it has been adopted by the Chinese robotics community. Open-source training data and simulation tools are also freely shared by academics worldwide with Chinese military researchers under CCP control.
In 2016, China’s Midea appliance manufacturer sought to acquire one of several leading global industrial robotics companies. It ultimately paid an almost 60 percent premium to purchase a controlling share in Germany’s
Kuka
. The company’s valuation increased to about $5 billion with the sale. At the time, Kuka provided robotic services to a U.S. military aircraft assembly line, among many other industrial uses.
In
California,
Kuka contributed to a moving assembly line that included “automated drill and countersink machines, automated coating application systems, and moving assembly lines [that] resulted in significant cost reductions, quality improvements and safety enhancements,” according to George “Nick” Bullen, an aerospace consultant.
That unit was
carved
out of the sale, but some of Kuka’s aerospace expertise likely leaked into China anyway. Berlin said there was no national security risk and greenlit the deal to avoid upsetting Beijing, on which German auto manufacturers depend for exports.
Now, Kuka is part of what arguably gives China a commanding lead in industrial and military robotics. In 2021, Kuka reportedly established a joint venture with the
Chinese
military contractor, Chongqing Chang’an Industry Group, to form an intelligent robotics company.
Two years later, China’s primary state-owned
satellite
manufacturer was reportedly using KUKA robots to manufacture satellites in Wuhan. China’s rapidly scaling satellite
constellation
production has negative national security implications for the United States and U.S. allies.
China’s military is the most likely to deploy combat-ready bi- and quadriped robots in the near future. In 2024, during joint exercises with Cambodia, China’s military demonstrated a Unitree B1 quadruped robot with an assault rifle mounted to its back.
In August, China’s state-owned defense corporation,
Norinco
, released a visual of its Fuxi humanoid robot. The Fuxi can conduct surveillance and, what appears from the visual, crowd control. The visual shows three synchronized humanoid robots with riot shields and raised batons.
According to Beijing’s mouthpiece People’s Daily, the Fuxi “can conduct all-weather reconnaissance, intelligent patrols and operations in hazardous areas, while allowing human operators to remotely control the robot’s movements in real time.”

Industrial robots are on display at a booth at the 2015 China International Industry Fair in Shanghai on Nov. 2, 2015. Getty Images
Perfecting the military use of humanoid and canine robotics requires not just the hardware of densely packed motors, gears, and actuators in each robot, but also extensive data to fine-tune how that hardware interacts with the physical environment. Human
trainers
are capturing information using head-mounted cameras, radar, motion-capture suits, and haptic gloves that measure pressure and touch.
These and other inputs provide robotic software and artificial intelligence (AI) with the physical interaction logs necessary for robots to learn and potentially exceed human efficiency in various military tasks.
Within five or ten years, according to analysts, China’s combat troops may increasingly use humanoid and canine
robots
for clearing tunnels, buildings, and ships of enemy combatants. Where tracked robots and drones cannot go, humanoid and canine robots may eventually beat humans in battle. They must overcome the better
endurance
of humans and wheeled robots, but when they do, they will have advantages in agility and power.
China’s military is already
calling
on robot developers to move their robots from laboratory development to military training grounds.
China’s robotics ecosystem is likely better positioned to produce combat robots than U.S. industry is, due to its
scale
, flexibility, government subsidies, and lower manufacturing costs. Its robotics factories are allegedly designed to shift between building different types of robots, some of which help build new robots.
In the first seven months of 2026, according to China’s National Bureau of Statistics, the country produced more than 635,000 industrial robots. Some of the humanoids walked themselves off the factory floor. China dominates the
global
market for humanoid robots, with about 95 percent of international shipments last year.
Siemens Digital Industries Software, the U.S. arm of a German company, has collaborated with UBTECH to build a “smart plant” that produces two of the company’s current models. This plant illustrates China’s industrial advantages over the United States and our allies.
According to Chinese state media Global Times, “On the production front line, embodied intelligent industrial humanoid robots such as the [UBTECH] Cruzr Y1 and Cruzr S2 participate in depalletizing, palletizing, loading, and material handling. Final assembly employs collaborative robots, power-assist manipulators, unmanned logistics vehicles, and 360-degree rotating worktables that enable multi-angle precision assembly in place, supporting flexible mixed-model production of multiple robot types.”
This makes China’s bipedal and quadrupedal robotics technologies, especially when combined with AI and other aerial drones and tracked robots, a unique threat to U.S. national security and that of U.S. allies.
Policymakers in democratic countries should consider increasing the scope and intensity of sanctions on military and dual-use robotics manufacturers in China, if not imposing broad economic sanctions on China as a whole. Tougher sanctions should at least be extended to other countries, such as Serbia, which, as an aspiring European Union member, should not partner with Chinese robotics companies.
Sanctions should be coordinated internationally and imposed globally on allies and non-allies alike so China’s robotics industry has increasingly few international outlets. And the democracies need to reconsider whether openly publishing and teaching their breakthroughs in robotics and other strategic technologies to foreign nationals from adversary states really makes sense, given their rapid military uptake by the enemies of democracy.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.