Frank Stronach won’t have to go to jail, judge says, after dramatic day of argument

Article content

TORONTO — Frank Stronach will not go to jail for the crime of indecent assault, a judge said in surprise final comments at his sentencing hearing.

Article content

Judge Anne Molloy of the Ontario Superior Court said Stronach should return to hear his sentence in December. It will not be custodial but still could involve conditions on his freedom.

Article content

Article content

The news followed a dramatic day of argument Thursday in which the Crown argued the 94-year-old autoparts billionaire should go to jail for six months, surrender a sample of his DNA, and be listed on Canada’s sex offender registry for 10 years.

Article content

Article content

“Only a real deprivation of liberty will do,” said prosecutor Jelena Vlacic.

Article content

Article content

Stronach’s defence lawyer argued that he should be granted an absolute discharge, which means no conviction would be entered on the charge of indecent assault for which he was found guilty in June, and there would be no conditions on his release.

Article content

Stronach was originally charged with 12 offences involving seven women, but all other charges failed for various reasons.

Article content

The victim, now in her 70s, gave a short statement from the witness stand on Thursday, the only evidence called in the day-long hearing that was dominated by technical argument over precedent cases and the purposes of sentencing.

Article content

“I am 20 years younger than the defendant. I felt ambushed, I felt overpowered, I felt my physical privacy was violated without my consent. My body and my sense of security were instantly injured. My self reliance was wounded when by confidence in the defendants character was shattered.”

Article content

In her testimony earlier this year, the woman (whose identity is protected) testified that she knew Stronach socially and was with him at the Toronto bar he owned, Rooney’s. She accepted his invitation to a nearby apartment, where Stronach abruptly pushed her face down over the arm of a chair and pressed himself against her from behind while lifting her skirt. There was no direct contact with her skin and both remained clothed. She described it as “bizarre” and “pathetic.”

Article content

Article content

“I felt I deserved an apology, I was upset when none was forthcoming,” she said in her victim impact statement.

Article content

Article content

Both sides discussed comparable cases. There was argument over the Crown’s comparison of Stronach to Peter Nygard, 85, the fashion mogul who was sentenced in 2024 to 11 years in prison over historical sex assault charges.

Article content

Shemesh objected to this and other comparisons of Stronach to perpetrators of outrageous sexual crimes, such as home invasion sexual assaults and repeated predatory behaviour against vulnerable victims. Despite Stronach’s wealth and fame, the defence lawyer told the judge this case is not like Nygard, or Bill Cosby, or Harvey Weinstein.

Article content

But the Crown highlighted Nygard to emphasize the point that Stronach’s advanced age should not necessarily work in his favour. She quoted the judge in Nygard’s case: “Were I to punish him less harshly than his moral blameworthiness calls for because he is now an elderly man, it would, in effect, validate the immunity that wealth and power have given him. In my view, it would be contrary to public policy. It would significantly devalue the importance of denunciation and deterrence. It would send the message that if you are rich and powerful and your victims are vulnerable…, you can escape accountability if you can hold off the day of judgment long enough. That is exactly the wrong message for the court to send. Although age is a factor that I must consider, there is a limit to the amount of weight I will give it.”