New York Times’ framing of Israel-Hamas war ‘imbalanced,’ lacked Israeli perspectives: study

Article content

The New York Times’ framing of the Israel-Hamas war is “imbalanced” with “sparse” reporting of Israeli casualties or Israeli suffering after October 7, according to a new study.

Article content

“I was not surprised by the direction of the findings but rather the magnitudes,” the study’s author Edieal Pinker told National Post in a written statement.

Article content

Article content

“For example, the fact that Israeli military casualties were mentioned so infrequently and were not regularly tracked as part of the basic context of the reporting was a bit shocking to me. Likewise, the fact that two out of every three days had an article that mentioned a personal story of a Palestinian or Lebanese civilian suffering was more than I had anticipated.”

Article content

Article content

The study, How the New York Times Framed the War Between Israel and Hamas, was published on Sept. 7 in the journal Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Pinker, a Yale School of Management professor, analyzed 1,559 news articles from Oct. 7, 2023 — when Hamas sparked a war by killing 1,200 people in Israel, including those at the Nova music festival, and taking 251 hostages — until June 7, 2024.

Article content

Article content

He told National Post that as a consumer of both U.S. and Israeli news, he was “struck by the difference in the perception of the war.” In particular, he noted how the “human element of the Israeli experience was missing in the mainstream U.S. media.”

Article content

Article content

In the study, he writes that the imbalances in coverage “create sympathy for the Palestinian people while at the same time diminishing Hamas’ responsibility for their situation and the continuation of the war.”

Article content

The Times largely depicts Israel as being the “sole aggressor” following the October 7 attack.

Article content

“Palestinians are portrayed as passive victims whose suffering grows daily as they are relentlessly attacked by the Israeli military,” writes Pinker, adding that framing the war in this context “offers a distorted view of the conflict.”

Article content

Article content

Of the articles identified as having to do with the conflict in the Middle East most directly, the study found less than four per cent had an “account of an Israeli’s struggles post October 7.”

Article content

Article content

“Only 52 articles overall (out of 1,559) make any reference to some dimension of Israeli suffering among the population that are not direct victims of October 7,” according to the study. 

Article content

The study does not downplay the devastation in Gaza, noting the tens of thousands of deaths and “widespread destruction of housing and critical infrastructure and the internal displacement of large proportions of the Gazan population.”

Article content

However, Pinker maintains that the media plays a role in how people view the war and news stories shape public opinion. Thus, the framing carries weight and can sway how the public believes the matter should be solved.

Article content

Article content

The Times’ framing of the war during the time period analyzed led readers to view the solution to the war as getting Israel to stop or greatly reduce its military operation in Gaza.

Article content

Conversely, another narrative would be to view Hamas as the problem.