Ali Siadatan: Don’t let ‘Islamophobia’ accusations silence criticism of Islam

Article content

That machinery did not build itself. Debate has given way to prescription: citizens are told which conclusions about religion are acceptable, and which questions may not be asked. Canadians who read a religious text for themselves, or hear it from an influential cleric online, and then voice concern, risk being told they have committed “Islamophobia.”

Article content

Here lies the paradox: enforced this way, “Islamophobia” can suppress legitimate criticism of Islam and, in doing so, contribute to the very anti-Muslim bigotry it claims to prevent.

Article content

When prominent clerics and Islamic movements proclaim the eventual triumph of Islam over other religions and societies, the message travels the world. Yet when people respond or defend their own beliefs, they risk being accused of hatred.

Article content

Islam has never confined itself to making claims about Muslims alone. In the seventh century, the Qur’an revisited the prophets and scriptures of Jews and Christians, presenting itself as their divine correction. The Jesus of the Gospels became the Isa of the Qur’an: not God incarnate, not the crucified and risen redeemer, but a prophet within Islam’s own account of history.

Article content

Article content

Christians and Jews were placed on the theological defensive from Islam’s beginning. The Qur’an has every right to make those claims in a free society, but Jews and Christians have the same right to answer them. No free society can accept an arrangement in which one religion may challenge all others but cannot itself be challenged.

Article content

Suppressing debate does not make disagreement disappear. It drives it underground, where frustration, fear and resentment accumulate. Instead of confronting particular doctrines, texts or political claims, people may begin to direct their hostility toward Muslims themselves. The effort to prevent offence can thereby help create the conditions for genuine bigotry. Debating those disagreements openly does the opposite: it drains the tension that bigotry feeds on.

Article content

Canada is now witnessing both anti-Muslim hatred and an alarming rise in antisemitism. Communities can trade statistics over who has suffered more. But beneath these conflicts lies a broader failure: a weakened culture of serious debate.

Article content

The Canadian answer is to restore the social contract of open debate: citizens free to question, challenge and rebut each other’s rival claims about God and history, while still owing each other basic decency. Pretending those claims are all the same, or all private, only forces a false peace. A Muslim’s person, property and freedom to worship must be protected. So must the freedom of Jews, Christians, atheists and others to examine and dispute Islamic teachings.

Article content

Article content

The constitutional tradition Canada inherited from Britain was built through centuries of painful conflict over religion, authority and conscience. That tradition did not end disagreement. It gave Canada something more durable: the capacity to hold disagreement without persecution or violence.

Article content

That inheritance inspired millions of immigrants to come here and breathe the air of freedom. We should not surrender it now.

Article content

The way forward lies neither in hostility toward Muslims nor in silence about Islam, but in a renewed commitment to a simple principle: protect people, scrutinize ideas.

Article content

Bigotry against Muslims must be opposed, without exception. “Islamophobia,” treated as an official paradigm for governing how Canadians may discuss Islam, must be refused just as firmly. Criticism of Islam, its theology, history, texts and political claims, must remain part of legitimate public debate.

Article content

Muslims have the right to speak. So do those who disagree with them. That reciprocity is freedom.

Article content

National Post

Article content

Ali Siadatan is a fellow at the Ideological Defence Institute and the head of education at Tafsik. Follow him at @AlispeaksX.

Article content