Home Active FIRST READING: The eyewatering cost of the projects Canada is pitching to investors
Active

FIRST READING: The eyewatering cost of the projects Canada is pitching to investors

Share
first-reading:-the-eyewatering-cost-of-the-projects-canada-is-pitching-to-investors
FIRST READING: The eyewatering cost of the projects Canada is pitching to investors
Share
Port of Churchill
The Port of Churchill, which is the subject of an $80 billion proposed expansion. Photo by Handout

Article content

First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.

National Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

TOP STORY

Article content

Recommended Videos

Article content

This week saw Prime Minister Mark Carney preside over the first-ever Canada Investment Summit, a large, Toronto-based gathering of international financiers. At the centre of the summit was a “pitchbook,” outlining a slate of pre-approved projects open for investment, most of them resource-based.

Article content

Article content

The projects are also incredibly expensive, with several proposals dwarfing anything that’s ever been built in Canada with private capital.   

Article content

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

High prices aren’t all that off-brand for the Carney government. Its 18-month tenure has been marked by a series of big-ticket purchases that are not just expensive, but expensive beyond all existing standards for what such a thing should cost.

Article content

The Liberals are continuing to pursue a high-speed rail project through Ontario and Quebec that is projected to cost up to $90 million per kilometre. In Europe, such a railway would come in for just $40 million per kilometre.

Article content

And just this month, Ottawa earmarked $4.7 billion for Via Rail to build 313 passenger cars – about $15 million per car.  For comparison, just a few months ago, Siemens signed a deal with the Swiss government to supply up to 200 six-car passenger trains at a cost equivalent to C$3.4 billion. That’s closer to a unit cost of between $2.8 and $5 million per car.

Article content

Below, a quick guide to some of the priciest items in the summit’s pitchbook, along with context about what kind of infrastructure money that represents.  

Article content

Article content

Port of Churchill expansion
Quoted price: $80 billion (US$57 billion)
What that could buy instead: 16 St. Lawrence Seaways

Article content

Article content

The single most expensive item in the Carney pitchbook, the Port of Churchill expansion, carries a capital cost more than twice as large as the entire annual budget of the province championing it. This year, Manitoba will ring up about $27 billion in total expenditures.

Article content

A Government of Canada description of the project notes that the expansion would prioritize “Indigenous equity ownership,” and is a plan to upgrade the port with an “all-weather road, an upgraded rail line, a new energy corridor, and marine ice-breaking capacity.” The last point being particularly important, as the port is currently frozen in much of the year. The idea is to make it an all-weather port.

Article content

As megaprojects go, one of the most successful in Canadian history is usually cited as the St. Lawrence Seaway, a system of canals and locks completed in the 1950s that connected the Great Lakes to Atlantic Ocean freighter traffic for the first time. And even when adjusting for inflation, the total cost of the seaway comes to about $5.3 billion. Or, about 17 per cent of the quoted Port of Churchill expansion price.

Article content

Wind West
Quoted price: $61.3 billion (US$44 billion)
What that could buy instead: Quebec’s largest hydro dam x 6

Article content

The Nova Scotia government is billing Wind West as both Canada’s first “offshore wind development” and the key to making their province “an energy superpower.” It’s basically a plan to install enough wind turbines in a particularly windy area off Nova Scotia to equal 40 gigawatts of power – about a quarter of the electricity that Canada is drawing at any one time.

Article content

Although, like all wind power, that’s only if the wind is blowing. There’s also a lot of unknowns for a project that size. Europe has been building offshore wind for decades, and it still has only installed a cumulative 19 GW worth as of 2023.

Article content

As to what kind of energy project $60 billion could fund instead, it would cover the construction cost of the largest hydro dam in Quebec six times over. The Robert-Bourassa generating station was built for the modern equivalent of about $9 billion in the 1980s.

Share
Related Articles
canada-can-learn-some-hard-lessons-from-brexit-as-it-pivots-to-the-eu

Canada can learn some hard lessons from Brexit as it pivots to the EU

Brexit scholar Anand Menon says closer ties with Europe cannot replace Canada’s...

interior-design:-nonna-maxxing for-the young-at-heart 

Interior design: Nonna-maxxing for the young at heart 

The new nonna-maxxing design trend highlights an appreciation for artisanal dinnerware -...

canadians-signing-up-to-be-deliberately-infected-with-flu-virus-to-aid-vaccine-research

Canadians signing up to be deliberately infected with flu virus to aid vaccine research

Article contentCanada first needed special isolation units, the challenge viruses and the...

‘our-neighbours,-our-friends’:-8-us.-celebrities-who’ve-thrown-support-behind-canada

‘Our neighbours, our friends’: 8 U.S. celebrities who’ve thrown support behind Canada

Article content“Jimmy Kimmel’s got a fallback job, he can always come here...