Opinion: Human rights museum director should be fired

Article content

Writing in these pages on Sept. 10, under the headline “‘Nakba’ exhibit is a direct assault on historical truths,” historian Jeffrey Herf explained what the exhibit leaves out and referred to its “propagandistic essence.” The misinformation multiplier for the physical exhibit is the museum’s social media propagation, including its so-called “resource guide” and a companion guide on how to talk to children about the conflict.

Article content

Ms. Khan told the Globe that the board was behind her — a majority voted down every motion to delay or restructure the display, and she says she had its confidence, otherwise, she would have paused. She also said that, throughout her tenure, the board was never shown the text or content of an exhibit before it opened.

Article content

Board members, including one of us, Mark Berlin, in fact asked to see the exhibit before it opened to the public. They were refused. The museum, when challenged, commissioned two academics it had handpicked to review it, yet, one of the two reviewers stated that she, like the board, was not permitted to view the exhibit.

Article content

Reading their assertions together, Ms. Khan and her defenders have constructed a hall of mirrors. She asserts that the board is not her “boss.” But the government cannot issue directives on the contents of exhibits. So, all the mirrors show the same face: the director can do whatever she wants.

Article content

Article content

The reality is that Section 27 of the Museums Act does restrain directives from the minister and cabinet on exhibits. It says nothing about the board, whose responsibility under Section 18(3) is untouched.

Article content

Nor does Section 27 touch the powers of appointment and removal: the board may remove the director with the approval of the cabinet, and the minister may remove board members, in each case with the cabinet’s approval. And it does not relieve the government of responsibility for ensuring proper and lawful governance, including using its powers of direction, appointment and dismissal.

Article content

People are entitled to different opinions about the Middle East. They are not, however, entitled to their own facts and their own laws.

Article content

Board members and the director serve, in the statute’s phrase, during pleasure. The government of Canada should no longer be pleased. On June 29, Marc Miller, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, told the Canadian Press that allegations the Board could not see the exhibit beforehand “would, to me, seem like an error in governance.”

Article content

Prime Minister Mark Carney said in June, announcing new measures against antisemitism, “Canada’s civic compact is failing Jewish Canadians.” He directed the council he announced that day to examine antisemitism across Canada’s shared public institutions — the CMHR is among them — and named as its chair the same minister who is responsible for this museum. Through its inaction, the CMHR is still feeding that failure rather than fostering the respect and understanding it exists to promote.

Article content

Article content

Miller, the government and Parliament must act now and decisively.

Article content

Ms. Khan says the museum already has several guidelines to ensure quality control on contemporary issues — guidelines that one of us, as a board member, was never shown. The Globe article reported that board members voted to have those guidelines distilled into a single document for their September meeting. The shuffling of internal papers by the same hands is not the reform that is urgently needed.

Article content

There must be a new board and a new director. The object of installing new leadership would not be punitive. It would be to restore an institution that is undermining its statutory mission and thereby causing serious harm.

Article content

National Post

Article content

Mark L. Berlin is a professor of practice at McGill University. He was a board member of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights until he resigned in June 2026 over the failures of the Nakba exhibit.

Article content

Bryan Schwartz is a professor of law and co-author, with Rhonda Spivak, of The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and Its “Nakba” Exhibit: Bias and Animus in Process and Outcome.

Article content

Article content