Sweden consistently outperforms Canada on universal health care despite similar spending: new study

Article content

Sweden and Canada operate publicly financed universal health-care systems, but access to care in the Nordic country is “markedly better,” according to a new report from the Fraser Institute.

Article content

In 2024, wait times leading to unmet medical needs affected two per cent of Swedes, compared with 9.1 per cent of Canadians, says the report’s author, Yanick Labrie.

Article content

Article content

The study argues that the difference between the two national systems can be found in the way they are organized. Labrie states that almost half (46.9 per cent) of primary care centres in Sweden are privately operated, while still fully funded by public dollars.

Article content

Article content

Labrie notes that private providers in Sweden perform more than 40 per cent of publicly funded hip and knee replacements and over 70 per cent of cataract procedures.

Article content

Article content

Private providers have also expanded surgical capacity, rather than displacing it, he suggests. Between 2001 and 2019, the share of cataract patients treated within 90 days increased from 36.9 to 88.2 per cent while median waiting times fell from 6.2 to 1.8 months.

Article content

More particularly, 85 per cent of patients receive a medical assessment within three days when needed, the study states.

Article content

Labrie states that European health-care systems have attracted an increasing level attention among Canadian policymakers. For example, he states that in May 2026, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith led a delegation to Sweden to learn more about the country’s approach to organizing and delivering health care within a universal system.

Article content

Labrie notes that similar to Canada, Sweden’s health-care system is founded on the principle that access to medically necessary care should depend on need rather than ability to pay. But discussions of health-care reform in Canada often become highly polarized when it comes to expanding the role of private providers, says Labrie.

Article content

Article content

“As a result, health-care policy discussions in Canada often focus primarily on preserving existing financing arrangements rather than examining alternative models for organizing and delivering care to Canadians.”

Article content

Article content

The primary responsibility for organizing health care falls under Sweden’s 21 regions, governed by local political assemblies. Regional authorities are responsible for organizing hospitals, primary care, specialist services, and provider-reimbursement systems. Municipal governments are primarily responsible for long-term care, home care, rehabilitation support, and services for older adults and individuals with disabilities.

Article content

In contrast, says Labrie, beginning in the early 2000s several provinces (Quebec, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and Alberta) merged regional health authorities into larger provincial organizations, reducing the autonomy of intermediary bodies.

Article content

Meanwhile, in Sweden patients commonly pay modest co-payments for primary care visits, specialist consultations, emergency department visits and prescription drugs. Annual caps substantially limit total out-of-pocket exposure.