China Targets Lawyers to Silence Faith Groups

The Chinese regime is continuing to use state violence to suppress religious freedom while applying political coercion against human rights lawyers, experts said.

Human Rights Watch reported on Sept. 9 that, in the first half of 2026, more than a dozen cities across China introduced measures to reward citizens for reporting “illegal” religious activities, as authorities tighten surveillance nationwide.

The rights group cited the case of Chinese lawyer Ruth Wang as the latest example. She fled to Taiwan on Sept. 2 after authorities threatened to shut down VDoor Law Firm, where she is a partner.

VDoor represents members of Zion Church, one of China’s largest underground churches.

Wang told The Associated Press on Sept. 4 that Chinese officials said she and her colleagues must dissolve the firm themselves or expect a forced closure.

“I believe it will definitely seriously affect my career development and other aspects of my life,” she said.

Shen Ming-shih, a research fellow at Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research, told The Epoch Times that “Wang’s decision to seek asylum during a layover in Taipei reflects the regime’s continued use of state violence or systemic methods to suppress religious freedom.”

But Shen said Jin’s release does not signal an improving religious environment in China, given that the regime’s pervasive crackdown also ensnares the lawyers who defend religious groups.

“Beijing’s strategy is to eliminate their legal counsel, leaving all religious organizations completely isolated and entirely without a voice,” Shen said.

Tseng Chien-yuan, an adjunct associate professor at Taiwan’s National Central University, said Beijing only permits state-sanctioned churches as it aggressively pushes “Sinicization,” rewriting texts like the Bible and the Quran to “crudely interfere with faith,” while demanding total loyalty from religious groups.

“Their forced veneration of the communist regime and Chinese leader Xi Jinping operates exactly like a religion, with Xi acting as the supreme leader,” Tseng told The Epoch Times.

He added that the CCP’s suppression of Wang bypasses standard legal procedures entirely.

“By directly pressuring the firm to dissolve, the regime is applying raw political coercion against the profession.”

Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council, a government agency that handles cross-strait affairs, said it has established procedures to handle such cases, though the island lacks a formal asylum system, Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported on Sept. 4.

Judiciary for Suppression 

Shen said that under Xi, the regime exerts total control over human rights lawyers in the name of “stability maintenance.”

“The ‘709 crackdown’ more than a decade ago shows that while Beijing emphasizes ‘comprehensive rule of law,’ this law is entirely dictated by the Party,” he said.

Shen said Wang’s case reflects the regime’s broader campaign to bring the legal profession to heel, as defending marginalized groups inherently challenges its authority.

“Through travel bans and fabricated charges to imprison defenders, the regime has turned the law from a protective shield into a weapon to purge dissent,” he said. “There is absolutely no independent or impartial rule of law in China.”

Weaponizing Border Controls  

Shen said Beijing is likely furious over Wang’s decision, potentially viewing the escape as a smear on its national image, and could leverage legal mechanisms to prevent recurrences.

“Although Taiwan lacks refugee or asylum laws, past practice shows the island will help asylum seekers resettle in the United States, Canada, or Europe,” he said.

“The regime will see Taiwan’s approach as ‘colluding with foreign forces’ and will intensify domestic travel controls through its new exit-entry regulations.”

To prevent similar escapes, Chinese authorities will give lower-level agencies greater authority and aggressively expand border watchlists, Shen said.

“For example, anyone associated with Wang or Zion Church will likely be barred from leaving the country, normalizing the strict approval process,” he said.

“Beijing will use every possible means to keep these ‘unstable elements’ within the country, further tightening its control over dissent and personal liberty.”

Tseng agreed.

“Intellectuals who are better able to access outside information will face strict curbs on their ability to travel,” Tseng said.

“To preserve the regime’s grip on power, it treats social stability as one of its top priorities.”